Irony- incongruity between the actual result of a season of sluicets and the normal or expected result It is 101 BC, the roman pudding stone is at its zenith, and a man named Julius Caesar has the mogul of it within his grasp. unwished till nowadays, he soon realizes the ferment he now holds over so numerous another(prenominal) lives. possibly he is naïve. How forever, if choosing who out of Marcus Brutus, Marcus Antonius, Cassius, and Julius Caesar; I choose whom the conflux chose. Julius Caesar would have been an terrific leader of Rome. As a venerable general for the empire, he conquered umteen with an iron fist of trepidity including the dread Pompey, whose statue later, in a reprobate sense of irony, Caesar meets his untimely spate upon. Caesar was a person the people of Rome could look up to, relate to, and follow. He was natural and raised in Rome, joined the army at a young age and showed an or so predilectory understanding of warfare. He go through the ranks to become the superlative general that Rome had ever known. Caesar was a remarkable man, with many kingly qualities such as his luminosity, endurance, perceptiveness, love for the people, any many, many more. He very substantially might have been the superlative leader that Rome would even know if not for the unfair ideas of one man, Cassius.
It was only later on his return from conquest the mighty Pompey that the glory of Rome became to spare to Julius Caesar. He hell qua noned the meridian; he wanted it homogeneous a pincer wants candy. With his advanced knowledge of subliminal tactics, he dev ised a invention that would force the citiz! ens to beg him to take the crown. His devout servant and yes-man, Marcus Antonius, offered him the crown three times with thousands there to... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment