Eichmann, the Banality of Evil, and Thinking in Arendts Thought Essay

Eichmann, the Banality of Evil, and Thinking in Arendts Thought* ABSTRACT I poll the ways in which the qualification of thinking can avoid ugliness action, taking into account Hannah Arendts discussion regarding the banality of evil and thoughtlessness in connection with the Eichmann trial. I focus on the following question comprise by Arendt Could the activity of thinking as such, the habit of examining and reflecting upon whatever happens to bang to pass, regardless of specific content and quite independent of results, could this activity be of such a nature that it conditions men against evildoing? Examples of the connection among evildoing and thinking include the distinction between the commonplace and the banal, and the absence of the depth characteristic of banality and the necessity of thinking as the mean for depth. I then focus upon Arendts model thinker (Socrates) and argue that the faculty of thinking works to avoid evildoing by utilizing the Socratic normal of n oncontradiction. What is the subject of our thought? Experience Nothing else (1) (Hannah Arendt)Eichmann in capital of Israel (2) was originated when Hannah Arendt went to Jerusalem in order to report, for The New Yorker, on the trial of Otto Adolf Eichmann, (3) who was acused of crimes against the Jewish people, crimes against humanity, and struggle crimes. The trial began in April 15, 1961. The New York Times had announced Eichmanns capture by Israeli agents in Argentina, in May 24, 1960. Israel and Argentina had discussed Eichmanns extradition to Israel, and the United Nations eventually decided the legality of Jerusalem Trial. After the confirmation that Eichamnn was to be judged in Israel, Arendt asked The New Yorkers director, William Shamn, to ... ...(29) Ibid.(30) Ibid.(31) See, in this regard, TMC, p. 425.(32) TMC, p. 423.(33) LM p. 168. (34) LM., p. 180.(35) (Protagoras, 339c.) LM p.186.(36) The first come out of the cleanity Lectures 1995, given by Arendt at New Scho ol, was published as Some Questions of deterrent example Philosophy. In Social Research, Vol. 61, No. 4 (Winter 1994), pp. 739-64. The separate three set abouts remain unpublished as Some Questions of Moral Philosophy. Morality Lectures 1965, New School for Social Research, Hannah Arendts Papers, The Manuscript Division, depository library of Congress, container 45. We will take the following systematic Some Questions of Moral Philosophy I for the part published and Some Questions of Moral Philosophy II for the unpublished one. This quotation is in Some Questions of Moral Philosophy II 024633.(37) Ibid., 024636.(38) LM., p. 193.