Effect of Policy on Hand Washing Effectiveness | Article

Effect of Policy on Hand Washing Effectiveness ArticleIn the article B are below the elbows does this insurance affect hand washing efficacy and reduce bacterial colonisation? published July 2010, the authors Wijwardena Greatorex primary(prenominal) focus was to establish whether dress code affects bacterial colonisation onwards and after hand-washing. interrogation was conducted using questionnaire and topics were collected in the form of quantitative data. The result shows that on that point were no signifi locoweedt deflexion between BBE and NB (Mann-Whitney, PThe authors rehearse of a critical abstract in regards to the main findings, results, conclusion, subjects and methods gives a detailed overview of the explore study, go awaying the commentator to assess and understand whether the interrogation is relevant with kayoed having to visualize the whole article (Galdon, Graves and Kelly, 2011). McNiff and Whitehead (2010) states that it is important for an abstract t o always be succinct to allow the reader to gain an insight into the look for and its importance (Chatburn, 2011). In addition, the abstract is clear, concise and free from jargons devising it easy for the reader to understand and not become conf lend oneselfd about the content of the look into.Secondly, the complexity of the results collected, charted and plot on the table and graph was simplified, making it easier for the reader to interpret and make sense of the findings. In addition, the results self-possessed besides represent the research as a whole, for it clearly reflects the aim and objective of the study. Hence the research is valid and reliable (Wood and Ross-Keer, 2011).However, the research is plausible as to whether it can be applied into practice and substantially enough to be represented to the targeted population. This is due to the small attempt size, which was sixty-sixty doctors, as a larger sample size can estimate population parameters (Sim and Wright, 2 000). And also, there was an ethical aspect of the research which give go for concern, as the authors clearly states that the participants were not give advance warning about the study and was conducted throughout the functional day. This suggests that the participants did not give informed consent, as it was the authors obligation to fully inform participants of the study before carrying out the research (Cottrell and Mckenzie, 2011).In the article Effects of bare below the elbows policy on hand taint of 92 hospital doctors in a district general hospital published in declination 2009, the authors Willis-Owen, Subramanian, Kumari and Houlihan-Burne, main purpose of the research was to establish whether the hands of doctors who are bare below elbows (BBE) compliant are cleaner than those who wore traditional attire (non-BBE). A prospective cross-sectional observational study was carried out and the result was presented using qualitative method. In the authors main findings, there were no significant difference in between those doctors who were BBE and those that were not.The aim of the research was clear and precise, as the authors avoided the use of jargons. In support to this, Schneider, Whitehead, LoBiondo-Wood and Haber (2013) comprehend that, aims of a research should be clear, broad, achievable and unambiguous as this guides the reader on how to interpret and snap the data from the result. This of significance as it outlines the authors overall intentions for carrying out the research as a result, the reader is given a clear outline on whether the research is of value and worthwhile (Taylor, Kermode and Roberts, 2006).Furthermore, the use of secondary sources used indoors this research to support findings, such as works from Fierer et al, informs the reader that there have been similar work done by other researchers (Brockopp and Hastings-Tolsma, 2003).This was also accompanied by a referencing system which clearly states all the literatures integra ted, along with the dates so that the reader has enough information to find the sea captain sources used within the study (Collins, 2010). This aids the reader to consider whether the literatures used were current and relevant to the study, and also gain an insight into how the authors went about conducting their research.On the contrary, the results gathered failed to establish the cause-effect of the research (Balakrishnan, 2010) of establishing the effects of BBE policy on hand contamination, which therefore lacks reliability (Wood and Ross-Keer, 2011). Consequently, the reader is unable to apply the findings provided into practice as it lacks logic and relevance. The authors use of language to analyse results in discussion was substandard, as they went to discuss patients preferences which was confusing, irrelevant and misleading.The article The Feedback Intervention tryout (FIT)-Improving Hand Hygiene Compliance in UK Health make out Workers A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Controlled tribulation, published October 2012, authors Fuller et al used randomised control trial to collect quantitative results. The main findings included all 16 trusts were randomised, 33 wards implemented hinderance (11 Intensive therapy units, 22 acute care elderly), mixed effects regression analysis (all wards) accounting for confounders, temporal trends, ward type and fidelity to intervention (forms/month used).The authors carried out their study in a randomised control trial (RCT). RCT according to Andrew and Halcomb (2009) is a study whereby participants are divided into treatment and control group to determine the effectiveness of a policy and practice interventions. This was appropriate within this research as the number of participants that took part sixty wards and the result obtained can be used to represent the general population. Hence in quantitative research, Chow, Shoa and Wang (2003) states that it is important to have a larger sample size, for the research to be valid and reliable (Solomon, Cavanaugh and Draine, 2009) and assures accuracy and integrity (This means that the reader is able apply theory to practice obtained through the research due to the credibility of the research.In contrast, the research lacked purpose and an aim, as it does not address a significant problem that prompted research (Monsen and Horn, 2008). As a result fails to inform the reader about what the study is trying to achieve by carrying out the research. For this priming the research fails to grab the readers attention as there is no clear savvy as to why the research is of significance.The authors illustrated that informed consent was established before the research was conducted. This is important within any research as this demonstrates that the participants were content to take part in the research and that ethical determine were upheld. This is important to the reader as this shows thatCohen, L., Manion, L Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in e ducation. (7thed.). Abingdon Routledge.Monsen, E. R. Horn, L V. (2008). Research Successful approaches. (3rded.). regular army Diana Faulhaber.Andrew, S. Halcomb, E .J. (2009). Mixed methods research for nursing and the health sciences. Chichester Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Cottrell, R. R. McKenzie, J. F. (2011). Health promotion education research methods Using the five-chapter thesis/dissertation model. (2nded.). Sudbury Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC.Sim, J. Wright, C. (2000). Research in health care. Cheltenham Stanley Thomes (Publishers) Ltd.Wood, M. J. Ross-Kerr, J. C. (2011). Basic steps in planning nursing research From question to proposal. (7thed.). Sudbury Jones and Bartlett Publishers.Schneider, Z., Whitehead, D., Biondo-Wood, G. L. Haber, J. (2013). Nursing and midwifery research 4e Methods and critical judgment for severalise-based practice. (4thed.). Chatswood Elsevier.Balakrishnan, N. (2010). Methods and applications of statistics in the life and health sc iences. New Jersey John Wiley Sons, Inc.Kermode, S. Taylor, B. Roberts, K. (2006). Obtaining approval and support for your project. In B. Taylor., S. Kermode. K. Roberts (Eds.), Research in nursing and health care Evidence for practice. (pp. 131-169). Australia Cengage Learning.Chatburn, R. L. (2011). Handbook for health care research. (2nded.). Sudbury Jones and Baartlett Publishers.Collin, H. (2010). Creative research The theory and practice of research for the creative. Switzerlan AVA Publishing SA.Brockopp, D. Y. Hastings-Tolsma. (2003). Fundamentals of nursing research. (3rded.). Sudbury Jones and Bartlett.McNiff, J. Whitehead, J. (2010). You and your action research project. (3rded.). Abingdon Routledge.Rees, C. (2010). Evaluting and appraising evidence to underpin nursing practice. In K. Holland., C. Rees (Eds.), Nursing evidence based practice skills. Oxford Oxford University Press.Galdon, R. J., Graves, W. R. Kelly, J. M. (2011). Getting published in the life science. New Jersey Wiley-Blackwell.Solomon, P., Cavanaugh, M. M. Draine, J. (2009). Randomized controlled trials Design and implementation for community based psychosocial interventions. Oxford Oxford University Press Inc.