Seminar in criminology classmate response 6 Essay

Seminar in criminology classmate response 6 - Essay ExampleIn her third paragraph, Gonzalez asserts that the defendant does non get a fair didder in a plea deal process because he or she may say guilt-ridden without a trial. In my opinion, even though Sudnow (1965) argues that most of the defendants pleading disgraced without trial be actually guilty, some are innocent. I believe those who are innocent may also decide to plead guilty because if pleading guilty is the only way that they are likely to save themselves, they end up doing it. For example, for a defendant who comes from a low-income household and has previous records of problems with the law, he or she is likely to plead guilty even when he or she is actually innocent. The defendant acts this way because of the possibility of being locked for only a short time. Additionally, defenders from low-income earning families are still likely to plead guilty even if they are innocent, because they would not need to gamble w ith a trial. People from low-income earning families may act this way because even when the state provides for them lawyer, because they do not believe in getting a just trial. As noted by Gonzalez, public defenders are known to be only accessible for only a limited time and the work they deposit on a case is also usually limited. Therefore, looking at it from a defenders point of view, most people would rather plead guilty and get a shorter sentence than germinate their chances in court, where the outcome might not be as favorable for