.

Tuesday, May 28, 2019

Whose Life Is It Anyway? by Brian Clark Essay example -- Euthanasia Me

Whose Life Is It Anyway? by Brian Clark Whose disembo ceased spirit is it whatsoeverway? is about Ken Harrison, a paralysed patient in hospital, and his conflict to end his own vivification. The problem here is that he is incapable of committing suicide and has to turn to euthanasia. The hospital is against this. They cannot deliberately let a conscious person die. In this essay I will tackle the question above, how Brain Clark persuades us that Kens decision is right. The title of the play, Whose life is it anyway? announces the issue. It is evidently Kens life, but the amount of choice and free will he now has in it is minimal. Ken believes he is already dead, metaphorically speaking. Because, creation in a state where he cannot carry out the things he would in an every-day life, is the same as being dead to him. I looked up the book of account life in the dictionary and I found that it means Human existence, relationships, or activity in general real life everyday life This is exactly what Ken does not have. So I can clearly see his point of wanting to die. Ken voices this point in the play I do not wish to live at any price. Of course I would like to live but as far as I am concerned I am dead already. I merely require the doctors to recognise the fact. I cannot accept this condition constitutes life in any real sense at all. The absence of freedom and choice makes you wonder just how much of a life he is now in self-command of. Despite it is his life - he isnt running it. Hence the title. This starts the play with a question and all further events are in answer to it. This shows it is meant to be, partly, a battle of wills between two sides over his... ...he play is about one man fighting for his right to end a shadow of a life, against an authority who cannot give fancy to him dying. Doctors say they should always preserve life. Before I read this play I agreed with this statement. Now, my opinion has changed. I believe it is not a upshot of life and death, but an issue of happiness and unhappiness, or more importantly, choice. To sum everything up, the ways in which Brain Clark persuade the readers that Kens decision to die is right is by using Kens personality, his intelligence and the important quotes he voices, the conflicting view of the doctors and they way Brain portrays them as the bad guys, and approximately importantly, the matter of something that goes beyond life and death. The matter of Kens happiness. Anyway, who is to say life is better than death?

No comments:

Post a Comment